When I was a medical student, I used to document
"tactile temperature" with a sense of serious doubt. Then one
of my attendings drew my attention to an article published in Pediatric Emergency Care in 1996. The article showed
that moms are pretty great at telling if their kids were febrile or not with
about 80% accuracy. When you compare that with ear thermometers, forehead
strips and other devices, 80% is pretty respectable. Now that I am a
parent, I do not need a study to tell me that moms know what they are talking
about. It is painfully obvious when my son has a fever. My house turns into Meltdown City as he loses
all abilities to cope with frustration.
He feels incredibly hot. This is usually topped off with a running
nose or some other lovely sign that his body has been turned into a virus
breeding ground. (I use my son as the
example because he has had many, many fevers.
Thankfully, my daughter has only felt warm once and this was accompanied
by a runny nose and happy baby smiles.)
I see a lot of kids whose parents have kept a
detailed record of the ups and downs of the thermometer readings. Some of
these parents are checking temperatures every two hours. To begin with, I
am super impressed by their dedication and ability to get the readings. You
see how well my one and only attempt went. How do you get a kid who feels
terrible to hold still that long? That many times in a day? It
cannot not be easy. To be completely honest, though, as a pediatrician, I
do not care about fevers in that detail.
For the most part, I do not care about the numbers at all. If you
are his primary caregiver and you tell me he had a fever, I believe you. I actually kind of prefer the
tactile temperature. Anecdotally, actual
numbers can make things more confusing. I
spend quite a bit of time sorting out and discussing home readings of 108,
99.7, 19 and Lo. The findings of a study done at Stanford University
indicate that most people (as in, every person surveyed) have a hard time
remembering what temperature readings dictate a true fever. Hands, on
the other hand, seem to have a pretty great memory for the difference between
warm and hot.
I have never checked my kids’ temperature because
the actual number does not make much of a difference to me. I know he (or
she) is sick. I know he has a fever.
And on day one, two and three of illness, I know that it is most likely a
virus. So if he does the other things he is supposed to do - breathe,
drink, pee and throw impressive fits when I approach him with the blue nasal
suction bulb - the height of his fever is not going to change much of what his pediatrician or I will do for
him.
Now, a caveat - there is always a caveat - neither
of my kids has ever been lethargic.
Neither of them has ever had a fever under the age of 3 months. If I was ever faced with either of these situations,
I do not know that I would waste time rummaging through the linen closet
looking for my digital thermometer. I
think I would be bee-lining it to the nearest medical center. The only situation that I can imagine myself
wanting to know a real number at home would be if I really thought my child had
a fever but could not figure out why. As
in, no runny nose, cough, upset tummy, etc.
But even in that case, I would probably be seeking out an objective medical
opinion fairly soon afterwards. A
temperature reading greater than 100.4 F would only speed my decision along.
References:
Dodd, SR, et al.
“In a systematic review, infrared ear
thermometry for fever diagnosis in children finds poor sensitivity.” Journal
of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006
Apr;59(4):354-7. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
Graneto JW and
Soglin DF. “Maternal screening of
childhood fever by palpation.” Pediatric Emergency Care. 1996 Jun;12(3):183-4.
Wallenstein
MB, et al. “Fever Literacy and Fever Phobia.” Clinical Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;52(3):254-9. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
No comments:
Post a Comment